HNW question

No ideas, no changes, no development, no entertainment, and no remorse

Moderator: Modulators

Locked
User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3814
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1091 times
Been thanked: 1250 times
Contact:

Re: HNW question

Post by NoiseWiki »

JLIAT wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 11:35 pm He limits his work to 20 minutes, says its meaningless noise, i'm prepared to accept this.
He does? I don't think so.. seems to me that the length is what the format will allow.. At any rate there's always a beginning and an end. On/Off a binary signal.

In order to express meaninglessness the word has meaning and so would any work described as meaninglessness. If one paints a canvas red and calls it red. then the mean of the painting has to do with the color red. Like wise to make "noise" and call it meaningless thent he work is about meaninglessness. Meaninglessness is the meaning of the work. The work signifies meaningless.. but it can't be "meaninglessness" because meaninglessness is a concept.

Actually please quote where Vomir himself uses the word meaningless. Interestingly enough if I google you are the first hit claiming it's meaningless. Did he say it in an interview?
User avatar
¾ dead
Merzwow
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2019 7:37 am
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 167 times

Re: HNW question

Post by ¾ dead »

JLIAT wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:27 am
RUBBISH wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:21 pm
Anyhow...what makes a noise wall harsh?
Is HNW just drone with distortion.
Yes.
The real question is what can we do about the distortion? Well, some filtering could smooth it out.
User avatar
RUBBISH
Merzbish
Posts: 3638
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:37 am
Location: Home
Has thanked: 761 times
Been thanked: 752 times

Re: HNW question

Post by RUBBISH »

xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:06 am
JLIAT wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:27 am
RUBBISH wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:21 pm
Anyhow...what makes a noise wall harsh?
Is HNW just drone with distortion.
Yes.

The real question is what can we do about the distortion? Well, some filtering could smooth it out.
EQ based effects?
place holder
User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3814
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1091 times
Been thanked: 1250 times
Contact:

Re: HNW question

Post by NoiseWiki »

Smooth Noise Walls?
User avatar
JLIAT
Merzwow
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 8:30 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: HNW question

Post by JLIAT »

xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:52 am

I've never heard of Richard Long.
He is a land artist, Sam Mckinlay name checks
Obviously I had major influence from artists like Ad Reinhardt, Richard Serra, Barnett Newman, Ellsworth Kelly, Richard Long, George Trakas, Kasimir Malevich, etc
And Obviously Merzbow has also fine art influences.

So it seems at least some of the progenitors of Noise are fairly locked into modernist culture... that's what interests me, that subsequent people in noise have regained its musicality, requirement for skill, expression and technique is an understandable reactionary move.
xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:52 am
As for consequences, they've already been executed. People find their niches. Some excel at making beautiful music and keeping grand traditions alive, though it often boils down to a more dignified/devoted form of pretentious "hipsterism" and steampunk wankery in the end. Fine and good, for what it is (hasn't it been that way throughout the ages?).
Throughout the ages no. More recently, no. The modernist tropes of progress, development, innovation have been replaced by "retro". Hence the return to " musicality, requirement for skill, expression and technique" but like retro, it's fake.
xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:52 am
At least they're elevating things a little, which is nice. The hairstyles may have changed. Maybe in the future, conductor's wands will have little laser pointers built into them. But it's essentially the same. Classical forms have not and are not going anywhere. They're just older now. They're the old ladies that lived in this quiet, gentile suburban neighborhood before it turned into a crowded, noisy, dirty, confusing, ghettoized shithole. You hardly see them because they only go out on Sundays. They're out of touch (understandably) with their surroundings.
Certainly in the UK a new trend is gentrification, of those ' noisy, dirty, confusing, ghettoized shitholes' evidently especially in London, but in the large cities. Brixton is a cool place to live, Pekham evidently is the place to be at night when the cheap cafes turn into restaurants for the Hipsters. Bermondsey, where some of my family once lived, working on the docks, now sports the White Cube gallery and fine dining.

But we seem well off topic. And I add that given the influences behind HNW, the minimalist critique I posted is I think relevant.
The term xe2x80x9cMinimalismxe2x80x9d was coined by the art writer, Richard Wollheim, Minimalism rejected the concept of the artist as an actor, as a specific personality with a signature touch. Minimalism was a rejection of Modernist aesthetics, stripping the object of any points of reference or meaning or physical attractiveness.
And I guess this is very much against the grain of the more xe2x80x9cperformativexe2x80x9d noise Artists, and their Art.

xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:52 am
I think we both recognize that's the consequence of Socialism, for better or for worse (I'm not making any arguments for or against, it's merely an observation. People can make of it what they like because I'm not interested in that).
Where?
xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:52 am
...actually i'm not that much interested. I'm no sociologist.
The myths of "US" and "Them" prevail. Maybe a helpful survival tool.
These two lines of thinking don't gel. At any rate, yes. It's a pretty easy conclusion to reach from an uncomplicated, naturalistic point of view (lions vs. antelopes). Naturalistic cognition hasn't left us, society has simply altered the landscape and twisted the methodology of nature as we understand it via the convenient "us and them" analogy of wilderness versus civilization.
There's certainly a palpable "me and them" dichotomy between you and the rest of us here,
Only very superficial. The so called 'rest' are as far as I can see lacking in any coherence once you scratch the surface. My or any scratching maybe heightens the panic. One of the still trotted out clichxc3xa9 is of individual creativity, its often here, and then there is the dichotomy between that and the xe2x80x9crest of usxe2x80x9d a motley crew. Is the neo Nazism of Warlock, or the Mysticism of cultofthesunmachine or anti fascism of noise bob in anyway a xe2x80x9crest of usxe2x80x9d, I don't think so. And others who I wont mention as they would be very upset, I see no xe2x80x9crest of Usxe2x80x9d. Maybe an illusion of camaraderie? More a band of Orcs than brothers :-).
xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:52 am
which is what I'm always reflecting back when I do try to talk with you. My understanding of it is that there's always going to be people with resources (including intellect, experience, etc.) who abuse them for both extreme and extremely petty reasons.
Hardly on topic, and if directed at me mistaken. I was replying to a question, how long HNW. My reply xe2x80x93 length is irrelevant, and I gave reasons. If you think different fine. But, HNW xe2x80x93 one of its instigators cites Minimalist artists, and here the reductive process does I think critique temporality. As temporality seems essential to music.
Bricks (Anywhere from a few seconds to just a few minutes, usually not more than 5)
Partitions (Anything that's approx. 10-20 minutes)
Walls (Averaging 30 minutes or more.
Seems to me a reactionary move.
xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:52 am
Things are not meant to be universally understood, particularly when we don't even speak the same language, and are unwilling to learn a new language. At any rate, I'm not someone who'd assert that meaning is universal, but that universality is in fact an absurd construct itself that isn't worth pondering, like gender. Or time. Or equality. (full disclosure: I don't see gender as a construct) That is part of the wackiness and fun of being self-aware, and aware of others, including others we hurt. Again, I don't understand what you're getting out of this.
I'm discussing HNW. Or trying to. What are you doing, getting out of it. I do see HNW as a limit, and recognise the reactionary ploy, but putting bells and whistles on it, bricks cement and then painting a mural on the wall, is IMO reactionary and once the mural pictures the tortured soul, or workers victories its back to the future. Understandable, but lets be honest if we can. HNW are easy and boring and not self expressive, so if you want excitement and self expression, get out the bells and whistles and the paint. Fine by me.
"Cage's 4'33" = 273 seconds xe2x88x92273.15xc2xb0 C = absolute zero."
User avatar
banned
Merzfinity
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:41 pm
Has thanked: 571 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: HNW question

Post by banned »

xc2xbe dead wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:01 am
Social_Drift wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:55 pm tl;dr
people are still making it new, that's not the issue. the issue is that the new isn't as fun [or as authoritative] anymore.
And that's just a side-effect of overpopulation, both literally and figuratively, in my mind. This is why people strive for "individualism". There's no alternative but to create your own private eggshell universe and the rules to go with it.
i blame the internet for everything you've said :D
User avatar
banned
Merzfinity
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:41 pm
Has thanked: 571 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: HNW question

Post by banned »

to make "noise" and call it meaningless then the work is about meaninglessness. Meaninglessness is the meaning of the work
you have to make certain aesthetic assumptions for that to work.
unless you want to say that everything that anything [particles] makes cannot be called meaningless without it having meaning.
by its contexts one understands that the meaninglessness of Minimal art like HNW is deliberate
it's the claim that -- presumably because all meaningless things are thought to be the same [they're not] -- context matters more than the work that i dislike.
User avatar
JLIAT
Merzwow
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 8:30 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: HNW question

Post by JLIAT »

NoiseWiki wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:05 am
JLIAT wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2020 11:35 pm He limits his work to 20 minutes, says its meaningless noise, i'm prepared to accept this.
He does? I don't think so.. seems to me that the length is what the format will allow.. At any rate there's always a beginning and an end. On/Off a binary signal.
Sorry of course he doesn't, my mistake, I mentioned the CD and the 12" with one side 45 rpm the other 33 1/3 !!! I was recalling his live performance I was at. As for your thing about binary, It wont help you, beginning and end = 1 0 = nothing in between. No third state. It would be possible using lots of Vomir tracks to construct a meaningful binary message. But the noise content would be irrelevant, and actually it is.
NoiseWiki wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:05 am In order to express meaninglessness the word has meaning
Sure. It points to a thing, a signified which has no meaning.
NoiseWiki wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:05 am and so would any work described as meaninglessness.
Have meaning, no. That would a contradiction - xe2x80x9cThis thing is meaningless, and has meaningxe2x80x9d
NoiseWiki wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:05 am If one paints a canvas red and calls it red. then the mean of the painting has to do with the color red.
The painting doesn't mean anything xe2x80x93 its red. What? do you think you mean human? Hello, who are you, Hi I'm Adrian and I mean Adrian. Strikes me as daft. Your computer means computer etc.
NoiseWiki wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:05 am
Like wise to make "noise" and call it meaningless thent he work is about meaninglessness.
Sure its an example. Just as the red painting is a example of redness, and the word red means a colour. The word red not being red.
NoiseWiki wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:05 am Meaninglessness is the meaning of the work. The work signifies meaningless.. but it can't be "meaninglessness" because meaninglessness is a concept.
Everything then is meaningful for you. Enjoy your meaningful day.
Actually the work might signify a red sunset, but as pure red it might be just that, a red object. A red rose doesn't signify itself.
NoiseWiki wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:05 am Actually please quote where Vomir himself uses the word meaningless. Interestingly enough if I google you are the first hit claiming it's meaningless. Did he say it in an interview?


xe2x80x9cNo Pointxe2x80x9d

pointless
[ point-lis ]
SEE DEFINITION OF pointless
adj.ridiculous, senseless
Synonyms for pointless
absurd
aimless
fruitless
futile
impotent
inconsequential
ineffective
ineffectual
insignificant
irrelevant
meaningless
powerless
"Cage's 4'33" = 273 seconds xe2x88x92273.15xc2xb0 C = absolute zero."
User avatar
banned
Merzfinity
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:41 pm
Has thanked: 571 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: HNW question

Post by banned »

who is missing the "point" when daric posts a khmer rogue meme?

it's probably just that people just have different ideas of responsibility and risk.
User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3814
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1091 times
Been thanked: 1250 times
Contact:

Re: HNW question

Post by NoiseWiki »

JLIAT wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2020 8:41 am xe2x80x9cNo Pointxe2x80x9d

pointless
[ point-lis ]
SEE DEFINITION OF pointless
adj.ridiculous, senseless
Synonyms for pointless
absurd
aimless
fruitless
futile
impotent
inconsequential
ineffective
ineffectual
insignificant
irrelevant
meaningless
powerless
So as an absolute rule.. whatever the artist says goes right? Because that's how art theory works.. artists tell you what the work is or isn't about and then you are shackled to that meaning or lack there of.. forever, in perpetuity lol
Locked